freaking Berkeley engineering… so true ;(
where my engineers at?!
true fucking story
Probably true for everyone, really. Still, hilarious.
(via fuckyeahengineers)
Source: graceliin
(image via www.steripen.com)
The first synthetic bacteria were created less than a year ago. Biological engineers are already scrambling to use the method developed by researchers at the J. Craig Venter Institute to create bacteria for a wide variety of applications. These biological engineers have a difficult task ahead of them, however.
The first synthetic bacteria created were formed from E. Coli, and the only custom code that was included in their genome was a “watermark”, containing the names of the researchers, the date, and so on. Despite the fact that these bacteria represented a huge milestone in the creation of synthetic genomes, they didn’t really do very much at all.
The current method available to create custom genomes involves trial and error. Designers insert packets of code, see what these packets do and either adopt this code or replace it on the next go-through. Researchers at the University of California in San Francisco (www.ucsf.edu) have a different design plan.
They are developing logic gates for bacteria which could allow engineers to program a genetic code much like they do a computer. This could pave the way for bacterial logic networks which could be used for sensing environmental changes as well as for the production of important organic molecules such as biofuels, various pharmaceuticals and even basic plastics. UCSF researchers have already developed the genetic code for a bacterial NOR Gate and are working to develop a set of software tools which could be used to “program” a genome.
(submitted to engineeringisawesome)
Source: steripen.com
Theo Jansen is an engineer-turned-sculptor from Holland who builds very unusual works of art. He calls them “wind beasts”. They have no on-board computers, no sensors and are completely analog creations which harness the power of the wind to move along the coasts of the Netherlands.
Jansen has spent the entirety of his adult life building his massive plastic wind beasts. The lessons of each windy season drive another year’s creation. As Jansen learned what makes a good wind beast and what doesn’t, his creatures evolved, developing central drive trains and even the ability to detect water and avoid it with a simple mechanical logic system based on aspiration.
Jansen has an intelligent designer’s love of his wind beasts and delights in finding out what works and what doesn’t. The beasts themselves have an interesting story to tell. A bounty of energy exists all around us that we can harness and sometimes the best answer to a unique problem doesn’t involve fancy gadgets or digital logic.
Source: youtube.com
Nos sacan años de ventaja.
just a little scary… going under all that pressure “under pressure”
Awesome bridges are what got me into engineering… and then I decided to work with microelectronics for whatever weird reason, not that I’m complaining (I love my work). I think what fascinated me about engineering is the thought that whatever you build in this world… that’s something that affects other people - often long after you yourself are gone. Obviously, bridges are an excellent example of that because they can last for decades, centuries, even millennia in some cases. From an existential standpoint I guess I see engineering and science as a sort of guaranteed immortality. You know that the work you’ve done has a lasting impact - both as people use directly what you’ve discovered and as people build upon it and adapt it to their own needs. There’s a certain creative satisfaction in knowing that what you dreamed up in your mind had a substantial impact on the way people live their lives.
Source: burning-soul
(image via mse.ufl.edu)
We do way too much drinking to be tied with MIT…
Source: mse.ufl.edu
(image via www.wikispaces.com)
A 1950s-Era Computer Chip
Five Things About NASA’s Mars Curiosity Rover
Mars Science Laboratory, aka Curiosity, is part of NASA’s Mars Exploration Program, a long-term program of robotic exploration of the Red Planet. The mission is scheduled to launch from Cape Canaveral, Fla., in late 2011, and arrive at an intriguing region of Mars in August 2012. The goal of Curiosity, a rolling laboratory, is to assess whether Mars ever had an environment capable of supporting microbial life and conditions favorable for preserving clues about life, if it existed.
1. How Big Is It?: The Mini Cooper-sized rover is much bigger than its rover predecessors, Spirit, Opportunity and Pathfinder. Curiosity is twice as long (about 2.8 meters, or 9 feet) and four times as heavy as Spirit and Opportunity, which landed in 2004. Pathfinder, about the size of a microwave oven, landed in 1997.
2. Landing—Where and How: NASA will select a site believed to be among the most likely places to hold a geological record of a favorable environment for life. The site must also meet safe-landing criteria. The landing system is similar to a sky crane heavy-lift helicopter. After a parachute slows the rover’s descent toward Mars, a rocket-powered backpack will lower the rover on a tether during the final moments before landing. This method allows landing a very large, heavy rover on Mars.
3. Toolkit: Curiosity will use 10 science instruments to examine rocks, soil and the atmosphere. A laser will vaporize patches of rock from a distance, and another instrument will search for organic compounds. Other instruments include mast-mounted cameras to study targets from a distance, arm-mounted instruments to study targets they touch, and deck-mounted analytical instruments to determine the composition of rock and soil samples acquired with a powdering drill and a scoop.
4. Big Wheels: Each of Curiosity’s six wheels has an independent drive motor. The two front and two rear wheels also have individual steering motors. This steering allows the rover to make 360-degree turns in-place on the Mars surface. The wheels’ diameter is double the wheel diameter on Spirit and Opportunity, which will help Curiosity roll over obstacles up to 75 cm high.
5. Rover Power: A nuclear battery will enable Curiosity to operate year-round and farther from the equator than would be possible with only solar power.
[NASA JPL]
Dude. This is awesome. It rappels down like something out of blackhawk down to get on the surface of Mars, it’s nuclear powered and it’s the size of a Mini Cooper… How has this not gotten more press?
Source: unknownskywalker
(image via www.wired.com)
It’s hard to make a fast helicopter. In fact, even the fastest helicopters are pretty slow in comparison to their fixed wing counterparts. Airplanes have outrun modern helicopters since the 1920’s - before the helicopter was even invented. Helicopters have a few advantages, however - they can land just about anywhere and they can hover. This makes them invaluable. Engineers often view the ideal flying machine as some amalgam of the these two types of aircraft: capable of high speeds but able to land anywhere. Engineers at Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation (www.sikorsky.com) are developing a new breed of helicopters which might someday achieve this middle-ground. The scion of this new breed is the X2 (pictured above), which uses a pair of twin rotors spinning opposite one another to evenly distribute lift along the entire aircraft as well as a high-powered tilt rotor in the rear of the helicopter to provide thrust. The X2 uses automated feedback to the utmost advantage, relying on redundant control computers and sensors to reduce vibrations and manipulate flight surfaces. The result is an incredibly smooth ride even in turbulent weather and the X2 is already shattering current speed records.
On the Energy Barrier
I’m of the opinion that the first physical system that every engineer and scientist should understand is the energy barrier. Energy barriers are one of those things that tend to appear in nature with a certain regularity as just about anything which is thermally activated tends to depend on them.
Are you interested in how the viscosity or diffusivity of a molecule changes with temperature? Well, there’s an energy barrier associated with molecular flow. Once a molecule has enough energy to move past its nearest neighbors, it is capable of jumping to another point in space. Perhaps you’re more interested in the ability of an electron to jump out of it’s orbital and into space? Well, there’s an energy barrier associated with that jump which has to do with the coulombic attraction of electrons to the nucleus of an atom. What about the speed of a chemical reaction? Well, the rate of reaction is temperature dependant because as molecules run into each other, there is generally an energy maximum associated with their approach which they must overcome in order to get into a stable minimum energy configuration associated with bonding. It’s this energy barrier which keeps reactions from being spontaneous at absolute temperatures equal to 0K (or - more generally - thermal energies less than the height of the barrier).
So, how can we model the energy barrier? Well, let’s say we have some distribution of particles sitting at a point with low energy (E1). Right next to this low energy point is a point with higher energy (E2) such that the difference between the two is E2-E1. There’s our barrier. These particles have a distribution of different energies because they are almost certainly bouncing around this barrier and off of one another with different velocities. If you wonder why it might be that these differing velocities lead to different particle energies, you can draw a parallel between velocity and kinetic energy by remembering that for a general hypothetical particle, kinetic energy is equal to half the mass times the squared velocity. The only particles which can surmount the energy barrier are those particles in the distribution with energies greater than E2.
Now, the distribution of energy that these particles possess is based on the type of particle we’re looking at. If these particles are atoms, they follow a Boltzmann Distribution. If they’re electrons, Pauli Exclusion applies and we have to follow the Fermi-Dirac Distribution. If these particles are photons and are trapped somehow, they cannot “feel” one another and the Bose-Einstein Distribution applies. All of these distributions act in such a manner that the energy difference is divided by the product of the temperature and Boltzmann’s Constant (“k” - a handy number which allows us to convert between temperature and thermal energy) and is set inside an inverse exponential. These distributions express the percentage of particles residing with energies above the barrier. So, if we want to know how many particles surmount the barrier and are “free” we just use the distribution itself multiplied by the number of particles (N). In the case of a Boltzmann Distribution, we get P=N/exp((E2-E1)/(kT)).
So, how do we, smart engineers and scientists that we are, manipulate energy barriers? The easiest way to do it is by varying a temperature. Raise the temperature and you will have more particles with energies greater than the barrier which will be “free”, so your processes tend to move faster. In solid state chemistry, the act of raising the temperature so that a reaction occurs at a faster rate is called “annealing”. Of course, there are some situations where you can’t raise the temperature enough to get the reaction to move fast enough. Impatient being that you are, you decide to change the only other variable in the equation that isn’t a physical constant, the energy of the barrier. Now how do you go about doing this? The barrier is defined by the matter that you’re working with, so you choose a different physical scenario.
In chemistry, if you have a reaction which has a really big energy barrier, you can sometimes break this reaction into smaller chain reactions which are a little less efficient but have a smaller energy requirement. As an alternative, you can introduce a catalyst which will reduce the energy barrier. When we grow carbon nanotubes, we grow them on a metal catalyst like gold or nickel. By doing this, we can reduce the reaction temperature required to form nanotubes from somewhere in the vicinity of 1000 degrees Centigrade to a paltry 400C to 600C.

In electrical engineering, the diode is one of those basic units that we use to create much more complex digital systems - including transistors. It exists simply as an energy barrier to electrons. Because temperature is generally one of those fixed constants in electrical systems (unless you want to light your motherboard on fire), we have to vary the size of the energy barrier. This is done by applying a larger voltage to the “low energy” side. Applying a larger voltage shrinks the barrier and allows more electrons through, increasing current. Diodes will act as an element in a circuit which will generally only pass current when the voltage applied is either a large negative value or a large positive value. This energy barrier acts as a fundamental “switch”.
So, my message to all scientists and engineers is to learn how energy barriers work and impress your boss/professor. You see these barriers everywhere and if you understand how they function, it’s much easier to understand how physical systems behave.




